USPTO serial 79097008
CE CIILOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4255698Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2012
- Examiner
- TOOLEY, DAVID E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CE CIILOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard P. Georget
244 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 2325NEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Builders' hardware of common metals, namely, metal bearings, metal pulleys, metal framing for fly screens, metal connectors for hollow extrusions; small hardware of metal, namely, nuts, bolts and screws of metal, metal hinges, threaded inserts of metal; hardware of metal for doors, namely, metal door rollers, metal hinges, metal door guides, metal door closers, metal knockers; locks of metal; metal mechanical combination locks; metal mechanical dialing locks; metal mechanical safety locks; mechanisms of metal, namely, metal latches, metal latch bars, metal handles, metal winders, for locking windows; mechanisms of metal, namely, metal latches, metal knobs, metal door handles, friction stays of metal for doors, metal rollers; runners of metal for sliding doors; metal spring locks; striking plates of metal for locks; parts of locks, namely, tumblers of metal; buckles of common metal; buckles of metal for connecting webbing and chain; clamps of metal for fixing doors; eyelets of metal; hinge clamps of metal; hinges of metal; metal hooks; metal fittings, namely, metal bearings, metal buckles, rail hooks of metal, metal end caps, metal hooks, retractable poles of metal, for curtains | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Builders hardware of non-metallic materials, namely, window framing for flyscreens, window corners for flyscreens, door knockers; building materials, not of metal, namely, window framing for glazing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Locks, not of metal; non-metallic rollers for sliding doors; non-metallic runners for sliding doors; non-metallic striking plates for locks; non-metallic parts of locks, namely, tumblers; curtain rollers; door friction stays of non-metallic materials; hinges, not of metal; hooks for curtains; non-metallic articles for hanging curtains, namely, curtain rods, curtain tracks; non-metallic clamps for fixing awnings; non-metallic clamps for fixing blinds; non-metallic clamps for fixing doors; non-metallic clamps for fixing insect screens; non-metallic clamps for fixing windows; non-metallic door furniture, namely, door guides, handles, latches | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CiiLOCK Engineering Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by CiiLOCK Engineering Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by CiiLOCK Engineering Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named CE CIILOCK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |