USPTO serial 79097027
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ross Panko
Ross Panko ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP1717 K STREET, NWWashington, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Research, namely, market information research in computer databases for others; research in the Internet and other computer networks for others in the field of business affairs; updating and maintenance, namely, management of data and information in computer databases; compilation of data and information in computer databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications, namely, personal and communication services; business telecommunications, namely, providing long distance, local and voice telecommunications services; providing access to online chatrooms, Internal news portals end forums; providing access to searchable databases for the transmission of news and Information between Internet users; ] providing access to information on the Internet; providing access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing access to computer programs in data networks [ ; providing access to electronic publications via the global computer network ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific and technological services, namely, consulting in the fields of telecommunication technology and information technology and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis of computer software and computer hardware and industrial research in the field of telecommunications technology and information technology; design and development of computer hardware, software and data base software; maintenance of software; technological consultancy in the field of telecommunications technology and information technology related to services included in this class; ] computer services concerning electronic data storage, namely, recording data for others on optical, digital and magnetic media for electronic storage [ ; rental of computers for data processing; website design for others; providing search engines for the Internet ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |