Drawing for ALTARIVA

USPTO serial 79097039

ALTARIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4123689Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2012
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTARIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin W. Schiffmiller

MARTIN W. SCHIFFMILLER KIRSCHSTEIN ISRAEL SCHIFFMILLER & PIERON425 5TH AVEFL 5NEW YORK, NY 10016-2223

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps and detergents for swimming pool maintenance, swimming pool covers and swimming pool sheltersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
006Transportable buildings of metal, particularly swimming pools, swimming pool covers and swimming pool sheltersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Transportable buildings not made of metal, particularly swimming pools, swimming pool covers and swimming pool sheltersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jul 30, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jul 16, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 16, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 10, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 31, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 6, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 14, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 2, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance