Drawing for X-LINE

USPTO serial 79097088

X-LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacle cases, chargers for electric batteries, chargers for electric devices like mobile telephones, docking stations for electric devices like mobile telephones, electric cables, especially cables for charging mobile telephones, spectacle cases with mounts for dashboards of vehicles, mounts for electric devices like mobile telephonesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 9, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 2, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance