USPTO serial 79097121
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
Michael D. Fishman Fishman Stewart PLLC39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Modified hand tools for use in construction, oil and gas, utilities and manufacturing fields, namely, hammers, screwdrivers, pliers, ratchet wrenches, wrenches, wrecking bars, scrapers, manually operated grease guns, wire cutters, wire crimpers, bolt cutters, glass cutters, hacksaws, punches, chisels, files, hex key wrenches, hex wrench sets, sledge hammers and lump hammers, socket wrenches, namely, ratchets, sockets and extensions for use with socket wrenches and sockets with a pin locking system for attachment to socket wrenches; tethered hand tools for attachment to tool belts and bags, sold both individually and as a unit in a tool kit, namely, hammers, screwdrivers, pliers, ratchet wrenches, wrenches, wrecking bars, scrapers, manually operated grease guns, wire cutters, wire crimpers, bolt cutters, glass cutters, hacksaws, punches, chisels, files, hex key wrenches, hex wrench sets, sledge hammers and lump hammers, socket wrenches, namely, ratchets, sockets and extensions for use with socket wrenches and modified sockets with a pin locking system for attachment to socket wrenches; tool belts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |