USPTO serial 79097231
EGOISTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4219889Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2012
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EGOISTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CY-3031 Limassol, CY
CY-3031 Limassol, CY
CY-3031 Limassol, CY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simor Moskowitz
Simor Moskowitz WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWSuite 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee [ ; tea; cocoa; sugar; artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, muesli, pasta, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods; pastry and confectionery, namely, sweets, candies, marzipan, cookies, cakes, chocolate; edible ices; honey ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 9, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |