USPTO serial 79097356
AUMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles; vehicles for locomotion by land, air, water or rail; tyres; motorcycles; bicycles; funiculars; trolleys; sleighs (vehicles); trucks; tilting cars | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Import-export agencies; auctioneering for others; sales promotion for others; procurement services for others, namely purchasing goods and services for others; accounting; auditing; rental of vending machines; tax preparation services; drawing up of statements of accounts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |