USPTO serial 79097382
AD'VATAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AD'VATAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; direct mail advertising; arranging newspaper subscriptions for others; business management and organization consultancy; book-keeping; document reproduction; employment agencies; computerized file management; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; online advertising on a computer network; rental of advertising time on communication media; publication of publicity texts; rental of advertising space; dissemination of advertising matter; public relations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; information about telecommunication; communications via computer terminals or via fiber-optic networks; radio or telephone communications; mobile radio telephone services; providing user access to a global computer network; electronic bulletin board services (telecommunications services); providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; news agencies; rental of telecommunication equipment; radio or television broadcasts; teleconferencing services; electronic messaging; rental of access time to global computer networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Evaluations, estimates and research in the scientific and technological fields provided by engineers; design and development of computers and software; research and development for others; technical project studies; architecture; design of interior decor; development (design), installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; consultancy in the field of computer hardware; data conversion of computer programs and data not physical conversion; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts designing; styling (industrial design); authenticating works of art | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |