USPTO serial 79097554
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vehicle water pump; cooling radiator for automotive engine; cooling water tank for automotive engine; mufflers for automotive engine; oil cleaner; air cleaner; diesel filter; spark plug for automobile engine; engine cylinder; piston for automotive engine | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Windscreen wipers; vehicle bumpers; gearing for land vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; vehicle suspension springs; brake segments for vehicles; brake linings for vehicles; upholstery for vehicles; seat covers for vehicles; transmissions, for land vehicles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |