USPTO serial 79097611
GRIMBERGEN ARDET NEC CONSUMITUR 1128
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4075885Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2011
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRIMBERGEN ARDET NEC CONSUMITUR 1128?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Devasena Reddy
Devasena Reddy HM Law Group LLP19925 Stevens Creek BlvdSuite 100Cupertino, CA 95014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer brewed from a recipe originating from Belgium | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlsberg Breweries A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Carlsberg Breweries A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Carlsberg Breweries A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named GRIMBERGEN ARDET NEC CONSUMITUR 1128
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 27, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2012 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 18, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |