USPTO serial 79097793
COQUUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4223684Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2012
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COQUUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
I-42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
I-42100 Reggio Emilia, IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible fats and oils; soups; stock-cubes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour; bread, pastry, ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice; mixes for making cakes, cookies, instant puddings, pastry creams, sorbets, dessert mousses, gravies and sauces; bases, namely, milk bases for hot process for making chocolate; milk bases for cold process for making cakes, cookies, instant puddings, bakery goods, sorbets, dessert mousses, gravies and sauces; chocolate gelato bases; fruit bases for making edible fruit ices; bases for making frozen yogurt; neutral product stabilizers, namely, starch based binding agents for ice cream and gelato; texture improvers, namely, thickeners in the nature of roux in order to prepare sauces, gravies, savory and sweet cream; traditional pastes, namely, almond pastes, chocolate pastes and fruit pastes for food flavoring; mousses, pastry creams, sorbets, cakes, parfaits, alimentary pasta; risotto | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 17, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |