USPTO serial 79097923
GLOW JUICE BAR AND CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOW JUICE BAR AND CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Provision of food and drink; cafe and cafeteria services; bar services; restaurant services; snack bar services; catering services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 3, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |