Drawing for TOPSTAR

USPTO serial 79097956

TOPSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Sponges, brushes, material for brush-making; articles for cleaning purposes, particularly cleaning cloths, metal brushes for dish washing, rubber glovesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 13, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 3, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 10, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 1, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance