Drawing for IMOLL

USPTO serial 79098001

IMOLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMOLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, seating furniture, office furniture, furniture for children and young people, tables, desks, computer desks, cabinets, office containers (furniture), shelves, file racks, chairsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 28, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance