Drawing for IMOLL

USPTO serial 79098001

IMOLL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMOLL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, seating furniture, office furniture, furniture for children and young people, tables, desks, computer desks, cabinets, office containers (furniture), shelves, file racks, chairsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 20, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 18, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 28, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 28, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 28, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 28, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 28, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 24, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance