Drawing for BRÖTJE AUTOMATION BRÖTJE

USPTO serial 79098021

BRÖTJE AUTOMATION BRÖTJE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4287178Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 12, 2013
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRÖTJE AUTOMATION BRÖTJE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe McKinney Muncy

Joe McKinney Muncy MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, PLLC4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors and engines not for land vehicles; Machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Data processing equipment and computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012Vehicles, namely, aircrafts; apparatus for locomotion by land or air, namely, automobiles and aircraftSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 17, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 17, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
May 13, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 13, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 14, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2018REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2013R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 9, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 10, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 10, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 14, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Mar 14, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 24, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 23, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 27, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance