Drawing for SR PERFEKT SCHWARZE-ROBITEC

USPTO serial 79098223

SR PERFEKT SCHWARZE-ROBITEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4173477Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2012
Examiner
LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SR PERFEKT SCHWARZE-ROBITEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence R. Robins

Lawrence R. Robins Sullivan & WorcesterOne Post Office SquareBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; transportable buildings of metal; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; pipes and tubes of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007Metal working machines; metal working machines, namely, tube and pipe bending machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 6, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 29, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 19, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 17, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 3, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 3, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 3, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 5, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 30, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance