USPTO serial 79098371
SENCL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENCL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for industrial purposes; unprocessed synthetic resins; cement for boots and shoes; mastic for leather; adhesives for paperhanging; synthetic resin plastics; glue for industrial purposes; plastisols | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |