Drawing for DE.TECT

USPTO serial 79098378

DE.TECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4251991Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2012
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DE.TECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L Gitler

STEWART L GITLER WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 DUKE ST STE 100ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-6101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for the storage, evaluation and visualization of data, namely, laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection consisting primarily of an evaluation unit in the nature of an electronic sensor and a fiber optical sensor cable; measuring apparatus and measuring devices and measuring instruments, namely, laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection with optical sensors and optical frequency domain reflectometers consisting primarily of an evaluation unit in the nature of an electronic sensor and a fiber optical sensor cable; checking/supervision apparatus, namely, laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection consisting primarily of an evaluation unit in the nature of an electronic sensor and a fiber optical sensor cable; checking/supervision instruments, namely, laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection with optical sensors and optical frequency domain reflectometers consisting primarily of an evaluation unit in the nature of an electronic sensor and a fiber optical sensor cable; signaling apparatus and signal instruments, namely, laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection with optical sensors and optical frequency domain reflectometers consisting primarily of an evaluation unit in the nature of an electronic sensor and a fiber optical sensor cable; electronic controls for ventilating equipment; electronic controls for fire extinguishing installationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Technological services, namely, engineering, planning, and designing of laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection with optical sensors and optical frequency domain reflectometers; industrial analysis of laser based systems for spatially distributed optical heat detection with optical sensors and optical frequency domain reflectometersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 21, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 5, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 5, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 6, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 18, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 14, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 14, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance