Drawing for BAKERDREAM

USPTO serial 79098476

BAKERDREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4228310Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2012
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BAKERDREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yue (Robert) Xu

Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cakes; starch for food; soya flour; condiments, namely, oyster sauce, pepper sauce, soya bean paste; bechamel sauce; yeast; aromatic preparations for food, namely, cloves, allspice, vanillaACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 22, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 22, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 11, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 9, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 9, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 20, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 6, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD
Aug 23, 2013FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 23, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 23, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 9, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 5, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2012PBPRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST
Jun 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 8, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jun 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 8, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 8, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 4, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 9, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 5, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 1, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance