USPTO serial 79098519
DOKTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOKTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils and fats, including sunflower oil, soya bean oil, rapeseed oil and other vegetable oils; milk and milk products; eggs and egg powder, fish and fish products, except live fish, including caviar and edible shellfish (except live shellfish); bouillon cubes; soup concentrates; butter cream concentrates; preserved, roasted, dried and cooked fruits, vegetables and mushrooms; jellies; jams; compotes; meat and meat products, including canned meat; charcuterie; sausages; wieners; edible proteins; game and poultry (not live); kefir (milk beverage); yoghurt; preserved meat, fish, vegetables and fruits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |