Drawing for AFALA

USPTO serial 79098592

AFALA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4231873Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 30, 2012
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AFALA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Gilman

Michael R. Gilman Kaplan Breyer Schwarz & Ottesen LLP100 Matawan RoadSuite 120Matawan, NJ 07747-3913

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treatment of genito-urinary system disorders, including erectile disfunction, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, modulators of the genital system, antiseptics and antiinfectives, antiinflammatory agents, antineoplastics and vasoprotectives; dietetic foods adapted for medical use, including food for babiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 29, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 6, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
May 6, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jan 31, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 31, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 30, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 5, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 25, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 25, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 24, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
May 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 21, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 21, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2011RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 7, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance