Drawing for ARISTO

USPTO serial 79098670

ARISTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARISTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; rolling mill products and metal billets; metal building materials and products; transportable buildings of metal; pipes of metal; safes (strong boxes); goods of common metal not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 26, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 11, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 23, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 23, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 11, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 29, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 15, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 14, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 14, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 8, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance