Drawing for LUMSEARCH

USPTO serial 79099001

LUMSEARCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4177529Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 24, 2012
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUMSEARCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L. KAPLAN & STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Data-processing equipment and computers; computer software, namely, a program for use in data processing; computer software for use in the fields of light planning, light simulation and light circulation for light installation measurements, and for designing and planning illumination systems for lighting designersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
035Advertising; business management services; business administration; office functionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Computer software design; scientific and technological services, namely, providing technological and scientific information and research and design relating thereto in the field of light planning, light simulation and light calculation for light installation measurements, and for designing and planning illumination systems for lighting designers; industrial analysis and research services in the field of light planning, light simulation and light calculation for light installation measurementsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 20, 2019INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 1, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 19, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 18, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 24, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance