USPTO serial 79099013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
IT
I-25128 Brescia, IT
I-25128 Brescia, IT
I-25128 Brescia, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter Hill Levie III
Walter Hill Levie III Meunier Carlin & Curfman LLC999 Peachtree Street NESuite 1300Atlanta, GA 30309| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Plastic composite materials in the form of profiles, rods, bars, flexible tubes, tubes for use in manufacturing; synthetic plastic material as semi-finished products in the form of rods, bars, profiles, hoses and tubes for use in a wide variety of industries; pultruded plastic composite material in the form of profiles, bars, rods, hoses and tubes for use in manufacturing; pultruded semi-finished goods of synthetic composite materials, in the form of profiles, bars, rods, hoses and tubes, for use in a wide variety of industries for industrial, and agricultural use; plastic composite profiles, bars, rods, hoses and tubes for use in manufacturing; sound barriers using composite profiles for use along highways and other transportation corridors | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Beams not of metal; non-metal gratings; non-metallic building materials, namely, composite profiles, bars, rods and tubes for reinforcement of concrete, ground, terrain and wood building construction; non-metal cable trays used in building construction; non-metal air conditioning ducts; non-metal ducts not for electrical circuitry; non-metal heating ducts; crash barriers not of metal; crash barriers of composite material composed primarily of plastics for roads; non-metal fence posts; non-metal posts and poles; poles of non metallic material; non-metal poles for electric power lines; non-metal telegraph poles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |