USPTO serial 79099194
HYDROPOREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4212014Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2012
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDROPOREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph W. Berenato, III
JOSEPH W. BERENATO, III BERENATO & WHITE, LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817-1173UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical implants of artificial materials, covered with an anti allergic coating, namely, endoprosthesis with anti allergic coating | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named HYDROPOREX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2012 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |