USPTO serial 79099230
RUBLEVKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RUBLEVKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; aperitifs, non-alcoholic; table waters; cocktails, non-alcoholic; lemonades; peanut milk (soft drink); isotonic beverages; whey beverages; fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic; milk of almonds (beverage); fruit nectars (non-alcoholic); orgeat; powders for effervescing beverages; sarsaparilla (soft drink); syrups for lemonades; syrups for beverages; tomato juice (beverage); cider (non-alcoholic); vegetable juices; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making liqueurs; preparations for making mineral water; preparations for making beverages; must; grape must; malt wort; extracts of hops for making beer; essences for (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau - Rule 13.2(b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages (except beer); aperitifs; arak; brandy; wine; piquette; whisky; vodka; gin; digesters (liqueurs and spirits); cocktails; liqueurs; alcoholic beverages containing fruit; spirits (beverages); distilled beverages; hydromel (mead); peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; cider; rice alcohol; alcoholic extracts; fruit extracts (alcoholic), alcoholic essences | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |