Drawing for LE PETIT OLIVIER

USPTO serial 79099240

LE PETIT OLIVIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LE PETIT OLIVIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soap; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifricesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2022FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 19, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 7, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 27, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 19, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 19, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 19, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 19, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 15, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance