USPTO serial 79099249
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs
Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric welding machines; electron beam welding machines; ultrasonic welding machines; robots machines; industrial robots; industrial robots, namely, robots for the construction of railway carriages; industrial robots, namely, robots for welding; industrial robots, namely, robots for metalworking; industrial robots, namely, robots for painting; industrial robots, namely, robots for assembling automobiles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Arc welding apparatus, namely, welding torches; [ electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; remote control apparatus, namely, remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices; ] remote control telemetering machines and apparatus [ ; remote control apparatus used in industrial robots, namely, electronic apparatus for the remote control of the operation of industrial robots and remote control transmitters for radio-controlled devices ; remote controls used in robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer software for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; recorded computer software for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer operating programs, recorded; recorded computer programs for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer operating system programs; robot operating programs, namely, computer programs designed for enabling the use and control of robots; robot operating software, namely, computer software designed for enabling the use and control of robots; robot control program, namely, computer programs designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot control software, namely, computer software designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot control systems comprising computer hardware and software designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot operating system comprising computer hardware and software for assembling equipment of railway carriage; robot control system for assembling equipment of railway carriage ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |