Drawing for R RAILBOT

USPTO serial 79099249

R RAILBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4152314Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2012
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R RAILBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric welding machines; electron beam welding machines; ultrasonic welding machines; robots machines; industrial robots; industrial robots, namely, robots for the construction of railway carriages; industrial robots, namely, robots for welding; industrial robots, namely, robots for metalworking; industrial robots, namely, robots for painting; industrial robots, namely, robots for assembling automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Arc welding apparatus, namely, welding torches; [ electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; remote control apparatus, namely, remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices; ] remote control telemetering machines and apparatus [ ; remote control apparatus used in industrial robots, namely, electronic apparatus for the remote control of the operation of industrial robots and remote control transmitters for radio-controlled devices ; remote controls used in robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer software for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; recorded computer software for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer operating programs, recorded; recorded computer programs for use in operating and controlling robots for assembling equipment of railway carriage; computer operating system programs; robot operating programs, namely, computer programs designed for enabling the use and control of robots; robot operating software, namely, computer software designed for enabling the use and control of robots; robot control program, namely, computer programs designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot control software, namely, computer software designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot control systems comprising computer hardware and software designed for enabling the control and monitor of robots; robot operating system comprising computer hardware and software for assembling equipment of railway carriage; robot control system for assembling equipment of railway carriage ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 24, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2019NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2019C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 12, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Dec 18, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Nov 26, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 6, 2018EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Jun 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 4, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Sep 14, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 7, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 6, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 1, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 1, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 1, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance