Drawing for UNIFLEX

USPTO serial 79099384

UNIFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4235699Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 6, 2012
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. McGlynn

John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia1007 Orange Street, Suite 1100P.O. Box 1596Wilmington, DE 19899

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Band conveyor, conveyor belts; rope belt conveyor, belt conveyor, roll conveyorSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017flexible pipes, not of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 12, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 12, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 7, 2020INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 7, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 6, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 6, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 28, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 18, 2012CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Sep 14, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 10, 2012EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jun 11, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 20, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 20, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 12, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance