Drawing for FLOATING CUSHIONS

USPTO serial 79099407

FLOATING CUSHIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLOATING CUSHIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, processing, transmitting and reproducing of sound and/or image; headphones and parts thereforSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 23, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 31, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 3, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 2, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 5, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 26, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 30, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 30, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance