USPTO serial 79099458
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry H. Tronco
Larry H. Tronco Holland & Hart LLPPO Box 8749Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sewing machines for household purposes, including overlock sewing machines; iron pressing machines; ironing presses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 13, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2017 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |