Drawing for TIELOCK

USPTO serial 79099486

TIELOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4181308Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2012
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIELOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

SCOTT J. MAJOR MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD FL 14ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials in the nature of reinforcing materials, in particular, fastening bars of plastic, fiber-reinforced plastic profiles, reinforcing bars for concrete buildings, support anchors, self-drilling anchors, rock anchor systems, injection anchors, formwork ties, stressed cables, reinforcing elements and horizontal mandrels for buildingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Building construction, in particular tunnel building and underground mining; installation services, namely, installation of reinforcing elements for building construction purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 30, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 31, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 31, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 31, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 10, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 22, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance