Drawing for GOLD ADAM

USPTO serial 79099518

GOLD ADAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4181309Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2012
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLD ADAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

Christine B. Redfield Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetMountain View, CA 94041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Treatment of materials, namely, melting down gold and silverSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Vocational education in the field of precious metals and their alloys; entertainment in the form of live musical entertainment; arranging of workshops in the field of buying goods of precious metals or coated therewithSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 3, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 3, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 8, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 7, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 19, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 28, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2011RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 24, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2011CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Sep 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance