Drawing for BURG SCHÖNECK

USPTO serial 79099671

BURG SCHÖNECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4212018Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2012
Examiner
WILLIS, PAMELA Y
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BURG SCHÖNECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brett A. August

Brett A. August Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson200 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2900Chicago, IL 60606-5896

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Sparkling wines, malt wines, fruit wines, sparkling fruit wines, vermouths; spirits, particularly liqueurs, brandies and alcoholic bitters which are good for the stomachSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 26, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 23, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Dec 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 26, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 13, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 25, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance