USPTO serial 79099677
SERENADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4159660Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2012
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERENADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
74167 Neckarsulm, DE
74167 Neckarsulm, DE
74167 Neckarsulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
Brett A. August Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson200 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2900Chicago, IL 60606-5896Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Spirit-based cocktails and aperitifs, spirits and liqueurs | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |