Drawing for EXXELENS

USPTO serial 79099768

EXXELENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4152330Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2012
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXXELENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

Marcus Stephen Harris Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP111 East Wacker DriveSuite 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Optical lens grinding, namely, processing of optical glasses, optical instruments, optical lenses as well as transparent sheets made of plastic with the aim of giving them different structuresSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 18, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 18, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Sep 11, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
May 23, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 5, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 7, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 7, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 28, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jul 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance