Drawing for EXXELENS

USPTO serial 79099768

EXXELENS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4152330Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 5, 2012
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXXELENS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Stephen Harris

Marcus Stephen Harris Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP111 East Wacker DriveSuite 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040Optical lens grinding, namely, processing of optical glasses, optical instruments, optical lenses as well as transparent sheets made of plastic with the aim of giving them different structuresSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 18, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 19, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 11, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 26, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 25, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 20, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 29, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance