USPTO serial 79099837
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dayro Alfonso Estevez
Dayro Alfonso Estevez ALFONSO ESTEVEZ, P.A.5410 W 10th LnHialeah, FL 33012UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ soup made of purple potato] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee; tea; tea-based beverages; sugar; non-medical nutrient powder, namely, yeast powder; pastries; ] instant rice; cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals, oatmeal, and cereal based snack foods; instant noodle; rice-based snack food; [ soya flour; ] vermicelli made from potato; [ ice cream; ] condiments, namely, pickled ginger, pepper sauce, chili paste, chili oil, soya bean paste, chutneys, mustard, and food seasonings, mixed for using as seasonings; condiments, namely, soy bean paste, spices, salt, gingerbread spice, garlic paste for use as a seasoning, white sugar, pepper sauce, mustard, vinegar, and sauces for flavoring Chinese hotpot; [ leaven, namely, yeast, baking powder and soda; aromatic preparations for food, namely, dried herbs, flavoring extracts other than essential oils, and coffee essences; preparations for stiffening whipped cream, namely, food starch; meat tenderizers, for household purposes; ] instant vermicelli; instant vermicelli made from sweet potato; instant rice noodle; condiments for cooking, namely, hot sauce, and soy sauce; [ sweetmeats being candy; ] cereal-based snack food; [ pop rice; prawn cracker in the shape of strips; crispy rice; miguo rice cake; instant dumplings; chili sauce being a condiments; fruit jellies being confectionery; puddings; puddings made from purple potato ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 3, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |