Drawing for MIMOS

USPTO serial 79100189

MIMOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIMOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopedic articles; suture materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
020Furniture, mirrors, picture frames; goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plasticsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 2, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 1, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 26, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 28, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 10, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 26, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2012PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
May 25, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
May 23, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
May 15, 2012PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 15, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 3, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 3, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 1, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 7, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 4, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance