USPTO serial 79100233
CERILAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERILAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, machines for laser machining; laser machines, more particularly for producing internal engravings and surface engravings as well as for cutting glass and other materials; engraving machines, machines for glass machining | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Scientific and optical measuring, signalling, control and teaching apparatuses and instruments; devices for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound, images and data; calculating machines, data processing devices and computers; apparatuses and instruments for conducting, switching, converting, regulating and controlling electricity; sources of laser beams not for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research work as well as designer services relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer consultancy services; production of computer software more particularly in connection with and for laser machining; engineering services, more particularly in the selection of software solutions and camera systems in connection with the laser machining of surfaces and the production of laser internal engravings; drawing up of technical reports; installation of computer programs; design planning, more particularly in the development and selection of laser systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |