Drawing for SATTLER THINKING HIGH TEX

USPTO serial 79100252

SATTLER THINKING HIGH TEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4184761Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2012
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SATTLER THINKING HIGH TEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Handelsman

Jeffrey H. Handelsman Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Tents, bags of textile for packaging, textile awningsACTIVE—
024Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of tents and in a wide variety of industries, table covers not made of paper, tapestries of textiles; textile material, plastic fabrics and coated fabrics for use in the manufacture of tents and in a wide variety of industries; coated fabrics for nonmetallic tubular bags; fabrics coated with thermoplastic coatings for use in manufacturing in a wide variety of industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 12, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 13, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 5, 2015CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 30, 2015ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 2, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 7, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 7, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 7, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 5, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 5, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 5, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 17, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance