USPTO serial 79100320
ZELISKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4188515Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2012
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ZELISKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
80809 München, DE
München, DE
80809 München, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Dolan
Christopher M. Dolan BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP1 North Wacker DriveSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Electronic fare management apparatus for automatic ticket issuing, reading and recording machines; Ticket printers for buses, for printing pre-sold tickets, and for ticket dispensers; Chip card readers and printers for use in fare management apparatus, clearing stations, chip card stamping machines, stamp endorsing machines, magnetic card stamping machines, traffic light manipulation, logical locating, destination indicators, passenger counters, timetable variance evaluation; Operating software for electronic ticketing machines, printers and chip card readers; computer software and programs for data acquisition, data management in administrative office support applications and generating customer-specific control data; Electronic display interfaces for use in telephones; Telephone charge computers; Apparatus for transmission of data; Transmitters of electronic signals for long-distance lines; Line audio amplifiers; Rail-safety apparatus, namely, safety devices for level crossings, half-way and full barriers in the nature of electronic signaling mechanism, namely, a train control system used in the railway industry for detecting and controlling trains, ground faults, broken rails, power failures, track switches and lights; Railroad crossing flashing safety lights and railway light and acoustic signals; Highway safety cones; Railway safety technology apparatus and equipment, namely, electronic signaling and control systems for trains and safety crossing gates; Electric relay equipment, namely, relays, apparatus for transmitting radio relay messages, transformers and radio relay cables; Optical and acoustic signaling equipment, namely, digital signal processors, electronic switches for audio and video signals; Loading apparatus, namely, electricity router for managing and optimizing energy loads within railroad crossings; Position indicators for half-way and full barriers, namely, electronic indicator boards; Electric meter printers for signal boxes, traffic lights, variable message signs, and matrix displays; Speed indicators for use in wave guide engineering; Signal simulators for use in railway wave guide engineering; Optical signal lanterns; Electronic signal transmitters; ] Current and voltage transformers for low and medium voltage; Bushing type current transformers for low and medium voltage; Electronic transformers for low voltage; [ Interstage transformers; ] Core balance transformers; Cast resin parts for the transformers; Transformers; Magnets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |