Drawing for GRAND REPOS

USPTO serial 79100387

GRAND REPOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4192453Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2012
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GRAND REPOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

Thilo C. Agthe WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 Wall Street, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10005-3701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Home furniture, chairsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2023NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 202371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 11, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 21, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 5, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 23, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 12, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 1, 2013FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 9, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 3, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 13, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance