Drawing for DR SUN

USPTO serial 79100465

DR SUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR SUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, skincare products for face and body, hair care products, perfumery, deodorants, washing productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
005Medico-cosmetic products for skincare and protection of the face, body and hair, medicinal balms ointments, oils, lotions, salts, gels, creamsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 4, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 16, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 25, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 25, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 11, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance