USPTO serial 79100506
DURASURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4235704Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2012
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURASURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
TODD A. DENYS PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C.600 Alexander Road, Suite 2-1PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water repellents in the nature of a fluorine chemical coating for use with industrial apparatus and instruments for creating oil barriers, preventing attachment of resin, preventing flux buildup and to coat fibers; oil repellents in the nature of a fluorine chemical coating for use with industrial apparatus and instruments for creating oil barriers, preventing attachment of resin, preventing flux buildup and to coat fibers; chemical coating agents for static occurrence control, damp-proofing, insulation, stain-proofing, acid resistance, prevention of stickiness, water repellant, oil repellant, low friction and low refraction factor for use in industrial apparatus and instruments; chemicals for industrial purposes, namely, fluorocarbon and fluorinated solvent | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | [ Solid lubricants for use in industrial apparatus and instruments; grease for shoes and boots; leather preserving oil and grease; mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes; non-mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 19, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 19, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 22, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |