Drawing for N° 1

USPTO serial 79100531

N° 1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FLETCHER, TRACY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with N° 1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations; soap; perfumes, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; depilatory preparations; make-up removing preparations; lipsticks; beauty masks; shaving preparations; preservatives for leather (polishes); creams for leatherSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 1, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 19, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 26, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 16, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 26, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2011RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 29, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 11, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance