Drawing for RUBLËVKA

USPTO serial 79100579

RUBLËVKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUBLËVKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers; mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; table waters; kvass non-alcoholic beverages; lemonades; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; orgeat; syrups for lemonade; tomato juice beverage; cider, non-alcoholic; beer wort; malt wort; sherbets beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
033Arak arrack; brandy; wine; whisky; vodka; gin; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; ciderSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 3, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 16, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 16, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance