USPTO serial 79100579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters; fruit drinks and fruit juices; table waters; kvass non-alcoholic beverages; lemonades; non-alcoholic honey-based beverages; non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; fruit nectars, non-alcoholic; orgeat; syrups for lemonade; tomato juice beverage; cider, non-alcoholic; beer wort; malt wort; sherbets beverages | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Arak arrack; brandy; wine; whisky; vodka; gin; peppermint liqueurs; bitters; rum; sake; cider | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |