Drawing for LEGATO

USPTO serial 79100651

LEGATO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGATO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary instruments and apparatus for use in general surgery, for use in orthopedic surgery, for use in endoscopy; apparatus and instruments for surgical, dental and veterinary purposes, namely, endoscopic equipment, endoscopy cameras, endoscopic forceps, fastening and guiding systems for endoscopes comprised of an electrical, mechanical or electro-pneumatical jointed tripod for holding and guiding endoscopes, surgical applicators, surgical blades, surgical cannulas, surgical chisels, surgical clips, surgical compressors, surgical cutlery, surgical cutters, endoscopic and surgical forceps, surgical guide hoses, surgical guidepipes, surgical guide wires, surgical implants comprising artificial material, surgical knifes, lasers for surgical and medical use, surgical perforators, surgical pliers, flexible surgical probe, surgical punches, surgical reamers, surgical retractors, surgical saws, surgical scalpels, surgical scissors, surgical staplers, surgical staples, surgical sutures, surgical trocars, surgical waterjet cutters, associated surgical instrument sets for use in endoscopic surgery, drills for surgical and dental use, apparatus for removal and herniated vertebral discs, medical cutting devices, needles for medical use, skin staplers, medical pumps, namely, irrigators for medical use, suckers for medical use; medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, insufflators; medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, apparatus for dispensing dissolution of carbon dioxide scrubbing; medical waterjet incision and removal apparatus; medical suture instruments; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopedic articles, namely, orthopedic joint implants, orthopedic supports; sutures and suture materialsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Design and development of computer hardware and software; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of medicine, surgery, dentistry, and veterinary medicine; technological and scientific consultation services and related research and design services; all the above services exclusively used in connection with medical technology appliances and devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 8, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 9, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 25, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 11, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 13, 2012ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 3, 2012LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Apr 3, 2012LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Mar 23, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Oct 12, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 27, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 18, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance