Drawing for RIEDEL

USPTO serial 79100679

RIEDEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIEDEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan Myers

JONATHAN MYERS LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND DATA NETWORKING HARDWARE, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR TRANSPORTING AND AGGREGATING VOICE, DATA AND VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS ACROSS NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURES AND COMMUNICATIONS PROTOCOLS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY, FIBER-OPTIC TRANSCEIVERS, FIBER OPTIC REPEATERS, CONVERTERS AND OPTIMIZERS, WAVE DIVISION MULTIPLEXERS, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, SWITCHES INCLUDING ETHERNET SWITCHES AND ROUTERS, TERMINATORS AND REPEATERS, AND REMOTE PRESENCE MANAGEMENT PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SWITCHES AND CONSOLE, ALARM, SENSOR AND POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICES; SIGNALING AND CHECKING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TEST AND MEASUREMENT DEVICES FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, INSTRUMENTATION USED TO TEST AND CERTIFY NEW AND EXISTING TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUSES, DATA AND VOICE COMMUNICATION CABLE AND COAXIAL CABLE; SIGNALING AND CHECKING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TESTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINE INTEGRITY TESTING APPARATUS; SIGNALING AND CHECKING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, FREE-SPACE OPTICS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, ETHERNET SYSTEMS AND ROUTERS, AND SOFTWARE SOLD AS COMPONENTS THEREOF, NAMELY, SOFTWARE ADAPTED AND ARRANGED FOR OPERATING, INSTALLING, TESTING, DIAGNOSING, AND MANAGING THE FOREGOING TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; SIGNALING AND TESTING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, COMPUTER ACCESS SYSTEMS WITH PASSWORD VERIFICATION, ELECTRONIC FLAG SIGNALS FOR MOTOR SPORT RACETRACKS, DEVICES AND SYSTEMS TO RECORD DATA OF A RACE CAR POSITION FOR MOTOR SPORT RACETRACKS, LED LIGHTING DEVICES FOR SIGNALS; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCTION OF SOUND OR IMAGES; DATA-PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AND COMPUTERSSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, AND DOCUMENTS VIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, PROVIDING FIBER OPTIC NETWORK SERVICES, PROVIDING ACCESS TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, PROVIDING INTERNET ACCESS VIA BROADBAND, OPTICAL OR WIRELESS NETWORKS; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS; PROVIDING PERSONNEL AS PART OF RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS AND INSTALLATIONS TO FACILITATE HOOK-UP AND INSTALLATIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 25, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 2, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 29, 2014FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 21, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2014FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2014FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 26, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 19, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 19, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 24, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 31, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jan 23, 2013OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2013OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Nov 9, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Oct 6, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 6, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 5, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 21, 2012UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 1, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
May 17, 2012DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 8, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 8, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 23, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 18, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance