USPTO serial 79100697
TRASHMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4192458Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TRASHMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Conveyors and feeders as parts of machines, namely, mechanical machines for removal of solids from liquids; [ Mechanical mud collectors as parts of machines that separate solids from liquids; ] mechanical separators for separating solids from liquids; sifting installations comprising bars or perforated plates to remove solids from water; raking installations for removal of solids from liquids, essentially consisting of mechanical rakes installed in channels of concrete or in steel containers; machines for separation of solids from sludge; mechanical climbing rakes for removal of waste solids from waste liquids | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Water purification apparatus, machines and installations; purification installations for sewage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 12, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |