USPTO serial 79100709
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony A. Bisulca
Anthony A. Bisulca CLARIANT CORPORATION4000 MONROE RDINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENTCHARLOTTE, NC 28205-7706| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints, varnishes, lacquers; preservatives against rust and against deterioration of wood; colorants; mordants; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artists | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |